Silas v. USA
Plaintiff: Silas
Defendant: USA
Petitioner: Royal Everett Silas
Not Classified By Court: Jennifer D. Johnson
Case Number: 2:2016cv00437
Filed: May 23, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
County: Salt Lake
Presiding Judge: David Nuffer
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2017 Civil Case Terminated per #13 Notice (alt)
June 9, 2017 Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Petitioner Royal Everett Silas (Mauro, Richard)
June 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STATUS REPORT ORDER Status Report due by 6/9/2017. Nearly three months have passed since the issuance of the Supreme Court's opinion in Beckles v. United States, 137 S.Ct. 886 (2017), and over two months have passed since the parties' filed their #10 Status Report request the stay of this case continue. Mr. Silas has now filed #11 pro se Motion for Status of Case. The parties shall meet, confer, and jointly file a report by no later than Friday June 9, 2017, stating the status of the case. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 06/02/2017. (apm)
May 30, 2017 Filing 11 MOTION for status of case filed by Petitioner Royal Everett Silas. (kpf)
March 20, 2017 Filing 10 STATUS REPORT by USA. (Murray, Tyler)
November 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Stay pending Pending Supreme Courts Ruling. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 11/28/16 (alt)
October 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 8 DOCKET TEXT ORDER taking under advisement #4 Motion to Stay. Counsel for Mr. Silas shall file a response to the #4 Motion to Stay on or before October 26, 2016. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 10/18/2016. No attached document. (lcl)
August 15, 2016 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Tyler L. Murray on behalf of USA (Murray, Tyler)
August 11, 2016 Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Change of Plea and Sentencing held on may 13, 2015 before Judge David Nuffer. Court Reporter/Transcriber Laura Robinson, Telephone number 801-328-4800. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. To redact additional information a Motion to Redact must be filed. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 9/1/2016. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/12/2016. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/9/2016. (rks) Modified on 11/9/2016 by removing restricted text (las).
July 22, 2016 Filing 4 MOTION to Stay Pending Supreme Court's Ruling filed by Respondent USA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3)(Shick, Holly)
July 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DOCKET TEXT ORDER - Pursuant to Standing Order 16-003, upon the filing of the sentencing transcript with the Court or upon the denial of the United States motion to stay pending Beckles, whichever is later, the United States shall have 21 days to respond to the motion to vacate. Any reply must be filed by the defense within 30 days after the filing of the response. No attached document. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 7/19/2016. (jds)
June 23, 2016 Filing 2 ERRATA to #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255), filed by Petitioner Royal Everett Silas . (Mauro, Richard)
May 23, 2016 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255). Related case: 2:15-cr-00071-DN-1. No filing fee required. AUSA added to the case: Yes. filed by Royal Everett Silas. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Envelope) Assigned to Judge David Nuffer (mms)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Silas v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Silas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Royal Everett Silas
Represented By: Richard P. Mauro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: Jennifer D. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?