Cases 1 - 10 of 780
Lemes Costa, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2817
Petitioner:
SILAS JUNIOR MARTINS LEMES COSTA, MIGUEL MARTINS REGES COSTA and JULYANNA COSTA REGES MENDES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martin v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03094
Plaintiff:
Brittany Valencia Martin
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Jon Loftus, Melinda Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reginald Harris, et al v. City of Little Rock, et al
as 24-1689
Plaintiff:
Reginald Harris, Latashja Harris, (Originally named as Latasha Maxwell), Montavion Harris and others
Defendant:
City of Little Rock, A Municipality, Kenton Buckner, Individually and in his Official Capacity, Robert Bell, Individually and others
SILAS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00418
Petitioner:
SHARELLE SILAS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Silas v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00853
Plaintiff:
Teresa Silas
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare Inc
Martin v. Calloway (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Silas Martin
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Civil Forfeiture
Martin v. Calloway (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Silas Martin
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Grey v. Whitmire
as 8:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Silas Grey
Respondent:
Don Whitmire
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Stephen Silas Thomas
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
