Butler v. EME Inc et al
| Butler and Vandy Butler |
| EME Inc, EME Service, EME Mechanical and John Bodnar |
| 2:2017cv00140 |
| February 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Evelyn J Furse |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 Taxation of Costs signed by Anne W. Morgan, Chief Deputy (kpf) |
| Filing 25 BILL OF COSTS filed by EME Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit of Costs)(Vaughn, Sarah) |
Filing 24
JUDGMENT - IT is Ordered that this action is dismissed with prejudice. Case Closed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 5/21/2018. (las)
|
| Filing 23 NOTICE VACATING Final Pretrial Conference and Jury Trial set before Judge Evelyn J. Furse (Notice generated by EJF Chambers) (lnp) |
|
Filing 22
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER GRANTING #13 Motion for Summary Judgment ; DENYING #18 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 5/18/2018. (lnp)
|
| Filing 21 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #13 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant EME Inc. (Vaughn, Sarah) |
| Filing 20 Plaintiff's REPLY to Response to Motion re #18 Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Vandy Butler. (Smith, Gregory) |
| Filing 19 Defendant's MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #18 Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant EME Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Butler Deposition, #2 Exhibit Bodnar Deposition, #3 Exhibit EME00085)(Vaughn, Sarah) |
| Filing 18 Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Vandy Butler. (Smith, Gregory) |
| Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion re #13 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant EME Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Offer Letter from EME)(Vaughn, Sarah) |
| Filing 16 Defendant's MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #13 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Vandy Butler. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits, #2 Affidavit DECLARATION OF PLAINTIFF VANDY BUTLER)(Smith, Gregory) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #13 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support. Replies due by 12/14/2017. Responses due by 11/23/2017 Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 11/3/2017. (las)
|
| Filing 14 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time Plaintiff's Response and Defendants' Reply in Support of MSJ filed by Defendant EME Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time)(Vaughn, Sarah) Modified on 11/3/2017 changed to a Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. (las). |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant EME Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit Plaintiffs Production 00001-00003, #3 Exhibit Butler Depo. 14:2515:2, 19:1218, #4 Exhibit Bodnar Depo., 9:2-9, #5 Exhibit EME0007071, #6 Exhibit EME000181, #7 Exhibit April Offer, #8 Exhibit EME00083, #9 Exhibit EME00014, #10 Exhibit EME00035, #11 Exhibit EME00068, #12 Exhibit EME00067, #13 Exhibit EME00075)(Vaughn, Sarah) |
|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Hearing vacated. Amended Pleadings due by 4/28/2017. Joinder of Parties due by 4/28/2017. Fact Discovery due by 9/28/2017. Expert Discovery due by 12/7/2017. Motions due by 1/4/2018. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/21/2018 at 02:30 PM in Rm 7.400 before Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse. Four Day Jury Trial set for 6/4/2018 at 08:30 AM in Rm 7.400 before Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse. Signed by Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on 4/10/2017. (las)
|
| Filing 11 JOINT STATEMENT OF PARTIES/ CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) by Defendants John Bodnar, EME Inc, EME Mechanical, EME Service, Plaintiff Vandy Butler. NOTE: All parties consented per #10 Attorney's Planning Meeting Report. (las) |
| Filing 10 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Vaughn, Sarah) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE REMINDER - All parties are requested to respond within the time frame set forth in the #4 Notice of Presiding Magistrate Assignment,, pursuant to General Order 07-001. If you have already consented/objected, please disregard this notice. No judge will be informed of a party's response unless all parties have consented to the assignment of the matter to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Unless consents from all parties are received within fifteen(15) days, the case will be randomly re-assigned to a U.S. District Judge without further notice.# Link to Magistrate Consent Objection form (las) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: (Notice generated by IPT Clerk)The Attorneys Planning Meeting Report and Proposed Scheduling Order forms, available on the court web site at # http://www.utd.uscourts.gov/documents/formpage.html, should be prepared 21 days before the Initial Pretrial Conference hearing date.NOTICE TO COUNSEL, The Court may enter a scheduling order and vacate the hearing if counsel(a) file a stipulated Attorneys Planning Meeting Report; and(b) e-mail a Proposed Scheduling Order to #ipt@utd.uscourts.gov21 days before the scheduled hearing. See instructions at # http://www.utd.uscourts.gov/documents/ipt.htmlIf counsel or the parties would like to participate by phone they must contact the IPT Clerk at least two days in advance at #ipt@utd.uscourts.gov to make arrangements. Initial Pretrial Conference set for 5/10/2017 at 11:00 AM in Rm 7.400 before Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse. (jds) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE FROM THE COURT re: Initial SchedulingThe court's IPT Clerk will now set the case for the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Conference (las) |
| Filing 6 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendants John Bodnar, EME Inc, EME Mechanical, EME Service. (las) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint filed by John Bodnar, EME Inc, EME Mechanical, EME Service.(Vaughn, Sarah) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 15 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendants John Bodnar, EME Inc, EME Mechanical, EME Service, Plaintiff Vandy Butler. Form due by 3/14/2017. (mms) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Defendants John Bodnar, EME Inc, EME Mechanical, EME Service, Plaintiff Vandy Butler. (mms) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Third District Court, Salt Lake County, case number 160906816, (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 1088-2703130) filed by EME Mechanical, EME Inc, EME Service, John Bodnar. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet 1, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse (Vaughn, Sarah) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse. Defendants John Bodnar, EME Inc, EME Mechanical, EME Service is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (mms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
