Cases 1 - 10 of 12,105
Bond v. Patriot Mortgage Corporation et al
as 6:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
James B. Bond
Defendant:
Patriot Mortgage Corporation, Brogan M. Weybright, City of Cottage Grove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Butler v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
as 1:2024cv01087
Plaintiff:
Tyzhima Butler
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Butler v. Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv01694
Plaintiff:
Randy Butler, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Human Services, Jenee Jones and Linda T. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
United States of America v. Butler
as 24-2467
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SYTREL DEFRANCO BUTLER
Cantrell v. Maplecrest et al.,
as 9:2024cv80475
Plaintiff:
Lisa Cantrell
Defendant:
Maplecrest and Paula Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Cases
RASHLEY v. First Enroll, LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80478
Plaintiff:
KYLE BUTLER RASHLEY
Defendant:
First Enroll, LLC and Access One Consumer Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
RASHLEY v. First Enroll, LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80473
Plaintiff:
KYLE BUTLER RASHLEY
Defendant:
First Enroll, LLC and Access One Consumer Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
