Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Rhodes v. Butler et al
as 3:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Rodney R. Rhodes
Defendant:
Rex L. Butler, Warren Wolfe Esq. and The Staff at Rex L. Butler & Asso.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lapitre v. Butler et al
as 3:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
Steve Claudy Lapitre
Defendant:
Rex Butler, Doug Miller, David Seid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brundage v. Butler et al
as 3:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
Aramis Brundage
Defendant:
Rex L. Butler, Amy Elizabeth Miller and Andrew Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stansberry v. Entry GCCC Disciplinary Committee et al
as 3:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy J. Stansberry
Defendant:
Entry GCCC Disciplinary Committee, Supts Ansal, Houser and others
Stansberry v. Enter Alaska Public Defender et al
as 3:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy J. Stansberry
Defendant:
Enter Alaska Public Defender, Sidery Bill, Fed Public Defe Johns and others
Stansberry v. Enter Medical Records Depts Medical Advisory Committees et al
as 3:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Leroy J. Stansberry
Defendant:
Enter Medical Records Depts Medical Advisory Committees, ACCE Medical Staff, N-3 Hample and others
Stansberry v. Enter Alaska Public Defender Attorney Case File et al
as 3:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Lee Roy J. Stansberry
Defendant:
Enter Alaska Public Defender Attorney Case File, Sidney Billingslea, Johnson and others
Eady v. Franciosi et al
as 3:2021cv00175
Plaintiff:
Tierre Fady and Tierre Eady
Defendant:
Michael Franciosi, Thomas Mathews, Jeffrey Bell and others
Stansberry et al v. Enter Federal Court Law Agency's et al
as 3:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
Megan M Rowe, Natasha, Darryl and others
Defendant:
Enter Federal Court Law Agency's, Dari R. Crosby, Timothy Burgess and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
