Alcon Vision et al v. Lens.com Inc
Plaintiff: Alcon Vision
Defendant: Lens.com Inc
Petitioner: Chad Costello
Counter Defendant: Novartis AG
Case Number: 2:2020mc00651
Filed: September 17, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Jill N Parrish
Referring Judge: Dustin B Pead
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 DOCKET TEXT ORDER: The court ORDERS Lens.com to respond to Mr. Costello's objection to the magistrate judge's order by November 16, 2020. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 11/4/2020. (ksb)
November 4, 2020 Filing 15 OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court by Chad Costello re #14 Order Lifting Stay,, Terminate Motions, (Joffee, Steven)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 RULING & ORDER LIFTING STAY. Motions denied #8 MOTION to Quash Deposition Subpoena and for Protective Order and #2 MOTION to Quash Deposition Subpoena. The court encourages the parties to cooperate in scheduling the deposition on a date and time convenient for Mr. Costello. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 10/26/2020. (nl)
October 14, 2020 Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION to Quash Deposition Subpoena and for Protective Order filed by Petitioner Chad Costello. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D)(Joffee, Steven)
October 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 10/08/2020. (nl)
October 7, 2020 Filing 11 **SEALED DOCUMENT** re #9 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,, #10 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #9 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,, filed by Defendant Lens.com IncNOTE: Filer is instructed to serve the sealed document on all other parties.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit O)(Bettilyon, Mark)
October 7, 2020 Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to File Sealed Document re #9 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion,, filed by Defendant Lens.com Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Bettilyon, Mark)
October 7, 2020 Filing 9 Redacted MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Quash Deposition Subpoena and for Protective Order filed by Defendant Lens.com Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Filed Under Seal, #2 Exhibit B - Filed Under Seal, #3 Exhibit C - Filed Under Seal, #4 Exhibit D - Filed Under Seal, #5 Exhibit E - Filed Under Seal, #6 Exhibit F - Filed Under Seal, #7 Exhibit G - Filed Under Seal, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O Filed Under Seal, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q)(Bettilyon, Mark)
September 30, 2020 Filing 8 MOTION to Quash Deposition Subpoena and for Protective Order filed by Petitioner Chad Costello. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(Strassberg, Evan)
September 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RULING & ORDER The deposition of Mr. Costello scheduled for September 24, 2020 is STAYED pending resolution of his Motion. Full briefing on the Motion is requested and the briefing schedule shall proceed as follows:*Mr. Costello's Motion due September 30, 2020;*Opposition due October 7, 2020; and*Mr. Costello's Reply due October 14, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 9/23/2020. (nl)
September 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 9/22/20. (ss)
September 21, 2020 Filing 5 REQUEST to Submit for Decision re #2 MOTION to Quash Deposition Subpoena MOTION for Protective Order MOTION to Expedite Decision filed by Defendant Lens.com Inc. (Bettilyon, Mark)
September 18, 2020 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #2 MOTION to Quash Deposition Subpoena MOTION for Protective Order MOTION to Expedite Decision filed by Defendant Lens.com Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Text of Proposed Order Denying Non-Party Short Form Discovery Motion) Attorney Mark M. Bettilyon added to party Lens.com Inc(pty:dft)(Bettilyon, Mark)
September 17, 2020 Filing 3 EXHIBITS - Docket sheet from Eastern District of New York re #2 MOTION to Quash Deposition Subpoena , MOTION for Protective Order, MOTION to Expedite Decision . (dw) Modified by removed a filer and adding description of exhibit on 9/18/2020 (rks). (rks).
September 17, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION to Quash Deposition Subpoena , MOTION for Protective Order , MOTION to Expedite Decision filed by Petitioner Chad Costello. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition, #2 Text of Proposed Order Granting Non-Party Chad Costello's Short Form Discovery Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena and for Protective Order, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Strassberg, Evan)
September 17, 2020 Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish. Petitioner Chad Costello is directed to E-File the Miscellaneous Case Filing Fee (found under Other Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 47.00 by the end of the business day. Once the filing fee event is completed the initiating document (Motion to Quash and cover sheet ) may be E-filed.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (dw)
September 17, 2020 Miscellaneous Case Filing Fee for Motion to Quash and Motion for Protective Order received from Petitioner Chad Costello. (Filing fee $ 47, receipt number AUTDC-3722909). (Strassberg, Evan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alcon Vision et al v. Lens.com Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alcon Vision
Represented By: Michael B. Miller
Represented By: Sabrina Larson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lens.com Inc
Represented By: William J. Natbony
Represented By: Brett J. Davis
Represented By: Jonathan G. Polak
Represented By: Nathan D. Thomas
Represented By: Mark M. Bettilyon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Chad Costello
Represented By: Steven J. Joffee
Represented By: Evan S. Strassberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Novartis AG
Represented By: Jamie A. Levitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?