Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Gonneville v. Lens.com, Inc.
as 1:2024cv11110
Plaintiff:
Angela Gonneville
Defendant:
Lens.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Franks v. Lens.com, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Oren Franks
Defendant:
Lens.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Fitzpatrick et al v. Lens.com, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02700
Plaintiff:
Mary Agrella Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
Lens.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Adam Nail v. Lens.com, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02531
Plaintiff:
Adam Nail
Defendant:
Lens.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Martin v. Lens.com, Inc.
as 0:2024cv60489
Plaintiff:
Rickey Martin
Defendant:
Lens.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Oren Franks et al v. Lens.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03870
Plaintiff:
Oren Franks and Others similarly situated
Defendant:
Lens.com, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
New Vision Unlimited, LLC v. Glasses USA, Inc et al
as 1:2022cv22534
Plaintiff:
New Vision Unlimited, LLC and New Vision Unlimited, LLC individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Vision Unlimited
Defendant:
Glasses USA, Inc, GlassesUSA Fulfillment Center Inc., GlassesUSA Retail, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Alcon Vision et al v. Lens.com Inc
as 2:2020mc00651
Plaintiff:
Alcon Vision
Defendant:
Lens.com Inc
Petitioner:
Chad Costello
Counter Defendant:
Novartis AG
Alcon Vision v. Lens.com, Inc et al
as 2:2020mc00639
Plaintiff:
Alcon Vision
Defendant:
Lens.com,Inc
Respondent:
1-800 Contacts, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Novartis AG
Alcon Vision LLC v. Lens.com, Inc.
as 6:2020mc09001
Defendant:
Lens.com, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alcon Vision LLC
Not Classified By Court:
5G Acquisitions, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
