Jeyaramachandran et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Govindasamy Jeyaramachandran and Priya Ramalingam |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Joseph B. Edlow and Kristi Noem |
| 2:2025cv01173 |
| December 31, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Daphne A Oberg |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF CONSENT Under DUCivR 72-3, returned Consent Forms from all relevant parties are now filed. The Magistrate Judge is presiding by consent. (mh) |
| Filing 11 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Petitioners Govindasamy Jeyaramachandran, Priya Ramalingam. (mh) |
| Filing 10 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Respondents Joseph B. Edlow, Kristi Noem, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (mh) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. For the benefit of the public and the bar, the District of Utah offers judicial settlement conference as an alternative for dispute resolution assistance in all civil cases and bankruptcy adversary proceedings. The court offers this alternative because, when compared with litigation, it can resolve a dispute faster, at less expense, and with solutions that are better able to meet the parties' needs and interests. Parties may file a stipulated motion for judicial settlement conference. A form #motion is available on the court's website. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Respondents Joseph B. Edlow, Kristi Noem, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Petitioners Govindasamy Jeyaramachandran, Priya Ramalingam. (mh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRESIDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-3, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail to the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed or mailed to Respondents Joseph B. Edlow, Kristi Noem, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Petitioners Govindasamy Jeyaramachandran, Priya Ramalingam. Form due by 2/13/2026. (mh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Tiffany M. Romney on behalf of Joseph B. Edlow, Kristi Noem, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (Romney, Tiffany) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Email Filing and Notification Form by Govindasamy Jeyaramachandran. (kop) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (kop) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Kristi Noem. (kop) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Joseph B. Edlow. (kop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joseph B. Edlow, Kristi Noem, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number 12605) (Fee Status: paid) filed by Govindasamy Jeyaramachandran, Priya Ramalingam. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet ) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg. (kop) (Main Document 1 replaced on 1/30/2026) (kec). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
