Sjodin v. State of Utah et al
Kirk Ardell Sjodin |
State of Utah, Washington County Board of Commissioners, FNU Benson, FNU Carpenter, FNU Hughes, Hurricane County Commissioners, St. George Commissioners and FNU LNU |
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit |
4:2023cv00016 |
February 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
David Nuffer |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 *** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement for Kirk Ardell Sjodin received from Correctional Institution. (jl) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Kirk Ardell Sjodin. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (jl) |
Filing 7 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Plaintiff Kirk Ardell Sjodin. (jl) |
Filing 6 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler for review, case file forwarded to PLU. (Received by the court on: 03/09/2023) filed by Plaintiff Kirk Ardell Sjodin. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (jl) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Kirk Ardell Sjodin against Washington County Board of Commissioners, FNU Hughes, Hurricane County Commissioners, St. George Commissioners, FNU LNU. State of Utah, FNU Benson (Chief, individual capacity, official capacity) and FNU Carpenter (Sgt, individual capacity, official capacity) terminated per amended complaint. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (jl) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Originally received by the court on 2/24/2023). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Kirk Ardell Sjodin. (Attachments: #1 Envelope 1) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler (ks) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/15/2023: #2 rescanned for OCR) (kb). |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Initial Partial fee: TBD. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the date of this order to file with the Court a certified copy of his inmate trust account statements. Collection of Fees Sent: No 2 IT IS ORDERED that:(1) Plaintiffs Oyler, American Civil Liberties Union, and Human Rights Defense Center are struck from the Complaint.(2) Class certification is DENIED.1 (3) Plaintiff's application to proceed without prepaying the filing fee is GRANTED. (4) So that Plaintiff's initial partial filing fee may be calculated, Plaintiff shall have thirty days to file with the Court a certified copy of Plaintiffs inmate trust fund account statement(s). If Plaintiff was held at more than one institution during the past six months, Plaintiff shall file certified trust fund account statements (or institutional equivalent) from the appropriate official at each institution where Plaintiff was confined. The certified trust fund account statement(s) must show deposits and average balances for each month. If Plaintiff does not fully comply, this complaint will be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler on 2/28/2023. (ks) |
Filing 2 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Complaint and envelope. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(haa) |
Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler for review, case file forwarded to PLU. (Received by the court on: 02/24/2023) filed by Plaintiff Kirk Ardell Sjodin. (haa) Modified on 2/27/2023 (haa). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.