Campbell v. Zink et al
| Christopher Campbell |
| Robert Zink, Jeremy Sullivan, David Pfindel, John/Jane Does #1-10 and Vermont State Police |
| 2:2022cv00006 |
| January 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| William K Sessions |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 ASSENTED-TO MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #3 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 3/1/2022. (This is a text-only Order.) (eae)
|
| Filing 6 ASSENTED-TO MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Christopher Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appearance)(Brady, John) Event/text clarified, link added on 2/28/2022 (law). |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by David Pfindel.(Gallagher, Kate) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kate T. Gallagher on behalf of David Pfindel.(Gallagher, Kate) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Vermont State Police.(Gallagher, Kate) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kate T. Gallagher on behalf of Vermont State Police.(Gallagher, Kate) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John/Jane Does #1-10, David Pfindel, Jeremy Sullivan, Vermont State Police, Robert Zink filed by Christopher Campbell. Summonses issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(law) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
