Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Sullivan et al v. Alabama High School Athletic Association et al
as 1:2026cv01776
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Sullivan, Phileepae Holloway, Matthew Land and others
Defendant:
Alabama High School Athletic Association and Dr. Michael Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Zink et al
as 2:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Christopher Campbell
Defendant:
Robert Zink, Jeremy Sullivan, David Pfindel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lefebvre v. Sullivan
as 2:2021cv00104
Defendant:
Jeremy Sullivan
Plaintiff:
Varian C. Lefebvre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leroy Wells v. Ellen Rosenblum, et al
as 17-36029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY LAMONT WELLS
Defendant - Appellee:
ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, SAMUEL ABRAHAM KUBERNICK, ANNA M. JOYCE and others
Wells v. Rosenblum et al
as 6:2017cv01370
Defendant:
Vicki Applegate, Neil F. Byl, Anna Marie Joyce and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leroy Wells v. Ellen Rosenblum, et al
as 16-35917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY LAMONT WELLS
Defendant - Appellee:
ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, ANNA M. JOYCE, BENJAMIN N. GUTMAN and others
Wells v. Rosenblum et al
as 2:2016cv01403
Defendant:
Robyn M. Anderson, Vicki Applegate, Kelly Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Nass et al
as 2:2016cv00582
Defendant:
Roybn M. Anderson, Vicki Applegate, Kelly Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Kruse et al
as 2:2016cv00423
Defendant:
Neil F. Byl, Michael Casey, C. Criswell and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Jeremy Sullivan
as 15-1989
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Jeremy Sullivan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
