Reynolds v. Fretz
Plaintiff: Mary Louise Reynolds
Defendant: David Fretz
Case Number: 1:2008cv00983
Filed: September 22, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Fairfax
Presiding Judge: Claude M. Hilton
Presiding Judge: Thomas Rawles Jones
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Notice of Removal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION Re: 25 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Mary Louise Reynolds and 26 MOTION for Summary Judgment by David Fretz. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas Rawles Jones, Jr on 1/27/2010. (stas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reynolds v. Fretz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Louise Reynolds
Represented By: George E. Tuttle, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Fretz
Represented By: Brian V. Ebert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?