United States of America v. $25,000 U.S. Currency

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit Virginia Eastern District United States of America v. $25,000 U.S. Currency

United States of America v. $25,000 U.S. Currency

Plaintiff:	United States of America
Defendant:	$25,000 U.S. Currency
Case Number:	1:2008cv01207
Filed:	November 19, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office:	Drug Related Seizure of Property Office
County:	Alexandria City
Presiding Judge:	John F. Anderson
Presiding Judge:	James C. Cacheris
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Plaintiff
Jury Demanded By:	21:881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 15, 2009	Filing 13 ORDERED for the reasons stated in open court, that the court adopts as its own the findings of fact and accepts the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Clerk of Court shall entered default judgment in favor of the Plaintiff Unit ed States of America and that an order of forfeiture be entered declaring that the $25,000 in funds seized from Ms. Dobbs be forfeited to the United States of America pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 881(a)(6) and that the Attorney General, or a designee, be authorized to seize the forfeited funds and take and exclusive custody and control of those funds once the other order becomes final. Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 5/15/2009. (jcor, )
March 9, 2009	Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 7 MOTION for Default Judgment as to $25,000 Defendant Currency filed by United States of America; Objections to R&R due by 3/23/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 03/09/09. Copies mailed: yes(pmil)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 15, 2009

Filing 13 ORDERED for the reasons stated in open court, that the court adopts as its own the findings of fact and accepts the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Clerk of Court shall entered default judgment in favor of the Plaintiff Unit ed States of America and that an order of forfeiture be entered declaring that the $25,000 in funds seized from Ms. Dobbs be forfeited to the United States of America pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 881(a)(6) and that the Attorney General, or a designee, be authorized to seize the forfeited funds and take and exclusive custody and control of those funds once the other order becomes final. Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 5/15/2009. (jcor, )

March 9, 2009

Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 7 MOTION for Default Judgment as to $25,000 Defendant Currency filed by United States of America; Objections to R&R due by 3/23/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 03/09/09. Copies mailed: yes(pmil)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. $25,000 U.S. Currency
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By:	Karen L. Taylor
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: $25,000 U.S. Currency
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?