James Madison Project v. Central Intelligence Agency
Plaintiff: James Madison Project
Defendant: Central Intelligence Agency
Case Number: 1:2008cv01323
Filed: December 22, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Freedom of Information Act Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: Thomas Rawles Jones
Presiding Judge: Gerald Bruce Lee
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 05:552 Freedom of Information Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Central Intelligence Agency. Signed by District Judge Gerald Bruce Lee on 8/31/09. (tche)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James Madison Project v. Central Intelligence Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Madison Project
Represented By: Neal Allen Puckett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Central Intelligence Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?