Nahigian et al v. Juno-Loudoun, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Keith Nahigian and Courtney Nahigian
Defendant: Juno-Loudoun, LLC and The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C.
Case Number: 1:2009cv00725
Filed: July 1, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Alexandria City
Presiding Judge: James C. Cacheris
Presiding Judge: Ivan D. Davis
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 207 AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION re 175 Plaintiffs Motion for Pre-Judgment Interest and Costs and Attorneys Fees. Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 11/5/2010. (tche)
October 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 191 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 175 MOTION for Attorney Fees by Courtney Nahigian, Keith Nahigian. Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 10/26/2010. (tche)
August 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 165 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 126 MOTION for Summary Judgment Or In the Alternative, For Partial Summary Judgment by Juno-Loudoun, LLC, 128 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Courtney Nahigian, Keith Nahigian, 134 MOTION for Summary Judgment by The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C. Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 8/23/2010. (tche)
March 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 80 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 57 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC. Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 3/30/2010. (tche)
January 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 34 MOTION to Dismiss Counts One and Three of the Amended Complaint, 37 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Count Two of Amended Complaint, 41 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint. Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 1/19/2010. (tche)
September 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 11 Motion to Remand, 7 9 Motion to Dismiss, and 5 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 9/28/2009. (rban, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nahigian et al v. Juno-Loudoun, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Nahigian
Represented By: John Chapman Petersen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Courtney Nahigian
Represented By: John Chapman Petersen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Juno-Loudoun, LLC
Represented By: John James Sabourin, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C.
Represented By: Oliver Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?