Robertson v. Barriet
Plaintiff: Jasper D. Robertson
Defendant: Barriet
Case Number: 1:2010cv00703
Filed: June 23, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Chesapeake City
Presiding Judge: Ivan D. Davis
Presiding Judge: T. S. Ellis
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION Re: 11 MOTION for Summary Judgment of Defendant Barrett by Barriet and 18 MOTION for Leave to Amend His 42 U.S.C. §1983 Complaint by Jasper D. Robertson. Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 7/13/2011. Copy sent to pltf pro se. (stas) Modified on 7/13/2011 to add language regarding copy to pltf pro se. (stas).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robertson v. Barriet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jasper D. Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barriet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?