Solis v. Berkopec et al
| Hilda L. Solis |
| Robert Lewis Berkopec, McIntyre Construction, Inc. and McIntyre Construction, Inc. 401(K) Plan |
| 1:2011cv00273 |
| March 17, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Alexandria Office |
| Virginia Beach City |
| James C. Cacheris |
| Thomas Rawles Jones |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER Upon consideration of the October 31, 2011, Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge designated to conduct a hearing in this matter, no objection having been filed within fourteen days, and upon an independent review of t he record, it is hereby ORDERED that the Court adopts as its own the findings of fact and accepts the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Clerk of Court shall enter default judgment in favor of the Hilda L. Solis, and agains t the Defts, McIntyre Construction, Inc., and McIntyre Construction, Inc. 401(K) Plan, jointly and severally, in the amount of $17,088.73. McIntyre Construction, Inc., be permanently enjoined from acting directly or indirectly, in any fiduciary capacity, with respect to any employee benefit plan subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 12/5/2011. (stas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
