City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System v. Computer Sciences Corporation et al
City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System |
Michael W. Laphen, Michael J. Mancuso and Computer Sciences Corporation |
1:2011cv00610 |
June 3, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Alexandria Office |
Out of State |
Ivan D. Davis |
T. S. Ellis |
Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 169 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 12/19/12. (klau, ) |
Filing 79 MEMORANDUM OPINION re Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Class Action, Motion for Class Certification, Motion to Strike. Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 8/29/12. (klau, ) |
Filing 36 ORDERED that the motions to consolidate are GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the consolidated action shall proceed under the the caption and case number: "IN RE COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, Civ. No. 11-610-TSE-IDD" ;. All further pleadings shall be filed exclusively in the consolidated case file and no further pleadings shall be file in the individual cases. The following cases are ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED: 1:11cv636; 1:11cv751; 1:11cv777. See Order for scheduled hearings, deadlines and discovery instructions. Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 8/29/2011. (nmcc ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.