Catalina Marketing International, Inc. v. Kappos Featured Case
Plaintiff: Catalina Marketing International, Inc.
Defendant: David Kappos
Case Number: 1:2011cv00659
Filed: June 17, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: James C. Cacheris
Presiding Judge: Thomas Rawles Jones
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2011 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Kappos filed by Catalina Marketing International, Inc. (Filing fee $ 350.00 receipt number 14683022313). (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Receipt, # 3 Exhibit 1)(pmil)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Catalina Marketing International, Inc. v. Kappos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Catalina Marketing International, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel Howard Sachs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Kappos
Represented By: Julie Ann Edelstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?