Currie v. Arthur

Currie v. Arthur

Plaintiff:	Robert D. Currie
Defendant:	Beth Arthur
Case Number:	1:2011cv00892
Filed:	August 19, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office:	Alexandria Office
County:	Stafford
Presiding Judge:	Ivan D. Davis
Presiding Judge:	Liam O'Grady
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 15, 2012	Filing 210 MEMORANDUM OPINION. The Court's previous Memorandum Opinion, Dkt. No. 191, is hereby AMENDED as follows. This matter comes before the Court on Arthur's Motion for Summary Judgments (Dkt. No. 150). For the reasons that follow and good cau se show, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. This constitutes the final appealable order of this case. (See Memorandum Opinion For Details). Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 5/15/12. (nhall) Text Modified on 5/15/2012 Per Chambers Request (nhall).
April 18, 2012	Filing 191 MEMORANDUM OPINION. This matter comes before the Court on Arthur's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 150) For the reasons that follow and good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. This constitutes the final appealable order of this case. (See Order For Details). Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 4/18/12. (nhall)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 15, 2012

Filing 210 MEMORANDUM OPINION. The Court's previous Memorandum Opinion, Dkt. No. 191, is hereby AMENDED as follows. This matter comes before the Court on Arthur's Motion for Summary Judgments (Dkt. No. 150). For the reasons that follow and good cau se show, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. This constitutes the final appealable order of this case. (See Memorandum Opinion For Details). Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 5/15/12. (nhall) Text Modified on 5/15/2012 Per Chambers Request (nhall).

April 18, 2012

Filing 191 MEMORANDUM OPINION. This matter comes before the Court on Arthur's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 150) For the reasons that follow and good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. This constitutes the final appealable order of this case. (See Order For Details). Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 4/18/12. (nhall)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Currie v. Arthur
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert D. Currie
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Beth Arthur
Represented By:	Jack Lewis Gould
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?