Penarrieta v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Plaintiff: Paolo Penarrieta
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Case Number: 1:2011cv00910
Filed: August 26, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Arlington
Presiding Judge: Ivan D. Davis
Presiding Judge: Anthony J Trenga
Nature of Suit: Naturalization Application
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1421
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION re Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 1/27/2012. (klau, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Penarrieta v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paolo Penarrieta
Represented By: Ivan Yacub
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?