Mongrut-Avanzini v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Plaintiff: Ana Cecilia Mongrut-Avanzini
Defendant: Commonwealth of Virginia
Case Number: 1:2012cv00152
Filed: February 15, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Loudoun
Presiding Judge: Claude M. Hilton
Presiding Judge: Thomas Rawles Jones
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 114 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 99 MOTION for Summary Judgment by County Of Fairfax. (See Memorandum Opinion For Details). Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 4/22/13. (nhall)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mongrut-Avanzini v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commonwealth of Virginia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ana Cecilia Mongrut-Avanzini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?