Staples v. Guardian Auto Glass, LLC
Plaintiff: Robert Kenneth Staples , Jr.
Defendant: Guardian Auto Glass, LLC
Case Number: 1:2012cv00477
Filed: April 27, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Alexandria Office
County: King WIlliam
Presiding Judge: James C. Cacheris
Presiding Judge: Ivan D. Davis
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: Deft's Motions to Dismiss and Deft's Alternative Motions to Stay. Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 06/14/12. (pmil)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Staples v. Guardian Auto Glass, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Kenneth Staples , Jr.
Represented By: David Reza Mahdavi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Guardian Auto Glass, LLC
Represented By: John Byron Flood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?