Hudson Insurance Company v. Persaud Companies, Inc. et al
Hudson Insurance Company |
Persaud Companies, Inc., Gary W. Day and Andy Persaud |
1:2013cv00003 |
January 2, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Alexandria Office |
Out of State |
Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
Anthony J Trenga |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 119 ORDERED that default judgment be, and the same hereby is, entered against defendants Persaud Companies and Andy Persaud on all counts of plaintiff's complaint and on all counts of Gary W. Day's cross-claim; that judgment be, and the same he reby is, entered against defendants Persaud Companies and Andy Persaud, jointly and severally, in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $2,037,338.51; that counterclaim plaintiff Gary W. Day's motion for default judgment 66 be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED; that judgment be, and the same hereby is, entered against defendants Persaud Companies and Andy Persaud, jointly and severally, in favor of counterclaim plaintiff Gary W. Day in the amount of $1,700,000.00 in damages, plus $82,287.06 in attorneys' fees and costs; taht the cross-claim of defendants Andy Persaud and Persaud Companies be, and the same hereby is, STRICKEN. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 1/3/2014. (rban, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.