Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Bandwidth.com, Inc.
Plaintiff: Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
Defendant: Bandwidth.com, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2013cv00932
Filed: August 1, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Henrico
Presiding Judge: Ivan D. Davis
Presiding Judge: Anthony J Trenga
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 281 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 107 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CONSTRUING CLAIMS. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 2/25/14. (see order for details).(gwalk, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Bandwidth.com, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
Represented By: Brent Lee VanNorman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bandwidth.com, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?