Rozsa v. Association of Clinical Research Professionals, Inc.
| J. David Moses Rozsa |
| Association of Clinical Research Professionals, Inc. |
| 1:2014cv00001 |
| January 2, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Alexandria Office |
| Fairfax |
| John F. Anderson |
| Gerald Bruce Lee |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rozsa v. Association of Clinical Research Professionals, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Association of Clinical Research Professionals, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jena Shane Cottreau |
| Represented By: | David Parker Phippen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: J. David Moses Rozsa | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Paul Kawel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
