Matthews v. RationalWiki Foundation
Plaintiff: Alexander Otis Matthews
Defendant: RationalWiki Foundation
Case Number: 1:2014cv00257
Filed: February 25, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: Theresa Carroll Buchanan
Presiding Judge: Liam O'Grady
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: Dismissal of Complaint for failure to serve pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the FRCP and failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b). Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 03/24/17. (pmil, )
February 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: Pltf's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Liam O'Grady on 02/08/17. (pmil, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matthews v. RationalWiki Foundation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alexander Otis Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RationalWiki Foundation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?