Lee v. Computer Sciences Corporation
Plaintiff: Earl Lee
Defendant: Computer Sciences Corporation
Case Number: 1:2014cv00581
Filed: May 20, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Frederick County
Presiding Judge: Theresa Carroll Buchanan
Presiding Judge: James C. Cacheris
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION - For the foregoing reasons, the Court will grant Defendants motion for summary judgment and enter judgment in the Defendants favor. An appropriate Order shall issue. Signed by District Judge James C. Cacheris on 02/24/2015. (dvanm, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lee v. Computer Sciences Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Earl Lee
Represented By: Aaron Jefferson Cheatham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Computer Sciences Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?