The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. The Chinese University of Hong Kong
| The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University |
| The Chinese University of Hong Kong |
| 1:2014cv00688 |
| June 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Alexandria Office |
| Out of State |
| Claude M. Hilton |
| Thomas Rawles Jones |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 146 |
| None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. The Chinese University of Hong Kong | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Chinese University of Hong Kong | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University | |
| Represented By: | Robert Danny Huntington |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
