Citigroup Inc. v. citibankthankyourewards.com et al
| Citigroup Inc. |
| citicardthankyou.com, citihankyou.com, citibankthankyourewards.com and thankyoucitibank.com |
| 1:2014cv00855 |
| July 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Alexandria Office |
| Out of State |
| Anthony J Trenga |
| Thomas Rawles Jones |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER that the Court adopts and incorporates the 19 Findings and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge; Pltf's 14 Motion for Default Judgment be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED; default judgment be, and the same hereby is, entered in fav or of plaintiff Citigroup Inc. and against defendant domain names <citibankthankyourewards.com>, <citithankyou.com>, <citicardthankyou.com>, and <thankyoucitibank.com>; Verisign, Inc. transfer the defendant domain names <ci tibankthankyourewards.com>, <citithankyou.com>, <citicardthankyou.com>, and <thankyoucitibank.com> from their current registrar accounts to CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.; CSC take all steps necessary to have the pltf Citigroup Inc. listed as the registrant for deft domain names <citibankthankyourewards.com>, <citithankyou.com>, <citicardthankyou.com>, and <thankyoucitibank.com> (see Order for details). Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 01/13/15. (pmil, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
