Blowers v. Lerner, Esq. et al
| Andrew Blowers |
| Andrew S. Lerner, Esq. and Gregory B. Walz, Esq. |
| 1:2015cv00889 |
| July 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Alexandria Office |
| Out of State |
| Gerald Bruce Lee |
| Michael S. Nachmanoff |
| Commercial/ICC Rates/etc. |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
140
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER. ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927, the Court requires Respondent Ernest P. Francis, former counsel for Plaintiff Andrew Blowers, to pay Defendants Andrew S. Lerner and Gregory B. Walz a total of $79,752.00 for the excess costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees reasonably incurred by Defendants as a result of Respondent Francis' misconduct. Signed by District Judge Gerald Bruce Lee on 9/14/2017. (rban, )
|
|
Filing
113
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER- IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court ADOPTS Judge Nachmanoff's Report and Recommendation 97 and OVERRULES Mr. Francis' Objection 104 ; it is further ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Sanctions under 2 8 U.S.C. § 1927 69 is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that Mr. Francis' Motion for Sanctions under Rule 11 74 is DENIED; it is further ORDERED that Mr. Francis shall pay Defendants a total of $84, 752.00 in reasonable attorney's fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1927. Signed by District Judge Gerald Bruce Lee on 8/31/2016. (see Order for further details) (dest, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
