Ayzin v. Orbital ATK, Inc. et al
| Robert Ayzin |
| Romas Martinez, IV, Janice I. Obuchowski, Ronald R. Fogleman, David W. Thompson, James G. Roche, Lennard A. Fisk, Scott L. Webster, Tig H. Krekel, Harrison H. Schmitt, Ronald T. Kadish, Martin C. Faga, Roxanne J. Decyk, Kevin P. Chilton, Orbital ATK, Inc., Douglas L. Maine and Robert M. Hanisee |
| 1:2017cv01151 |
| October 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Alexandria Office |
| Out of State |
| John F Anderson |
| Claude M Hilton |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
So Ordered re #2 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Robert Ayzin. Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 11/27/2017. (dvanm, )
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Robert Ayzin (Tripodi, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kevin P. Chilton, Roxanne J. Decyk, Martin C. Faga, Lennard A. Fisk, Ronald R. Fogleman, Robert M. Hanisee, Ronald T. Kadish, Tig H. Krekel, Douglas L. Maine, Romas Martinez, IV, Janice I. Obuchowski, Orbital ATK, Inc., James G. Roche, Harrison H. Schmitt, David W. Thompson, Scott L. Webster ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-5758488.), filed by Robert Ayzin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Letter)(dvanm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
