On Deck Capital, Inc. v. Polaris Corporation et al
On Deck Capital, Inc. |
Polaris Corporation and John Hageman |
1:2018cv00870 |
July 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Alexandria Office |
Arlington |
Ivan D Davis |
Claude M Hilton |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 So Ordered re #4 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal against Defendants, Polaris Corporation and John Hageman, without prejudice, filed by On Deck Capital, Inc.. Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 8/7/18. (klau, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by On Deck Capital, Inc. (Whitridge, David) |
Notice of Correction re #2 MOTION to Dismiss . The filing user has been notified to file a Notice of Hearing Date or a Notice of Waiver of Oral Argument. (dvanm, ) |
Filing 3 EXHIBIT (Corrected) 1 by John Hageman, Polaris Corporation.. (Breeden, Thomas) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss by John Hageman, Polaris Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Memorandum, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)(Breeden, Thomas) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Arlington County Circuit Court, case number CL18-1279 ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6177077.), filed by Polaris Corporation, John Hageman. (No Answer Filed) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(klau, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.