Synaptek Corporation v. Sentinel Insurance Company
Synaptek Corporation |
Sentinel Insurance Company |
1:2018cv00968 |
August 3, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Alexandria Office |
Fairfax |
Michael S Nachmanoff |
Liam O'Grady |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 2201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Set Deadlines as to #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . Motion Hearing set for 11/9/2018 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 600 before District Judge Liam O'Grady. (klau, ) |
Filing 13 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by David A. Gauntlett and Certification of Local Counsel Craig C. Reilly Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6277109. by Synaptek Corporation. (Reilly, Craig) |
Filing 12 Notice of Hearing Date set for November 9, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Reza, Syed) |
Filing 11 Memorandum in Support re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Sentinel Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Reza, Syed) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Sentinel Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Reza, Syed) |
|
Filing 8 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Jonathan Adrian Constine and Certification of Local Counsel S. Mohsin Reza Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6270587. by Sentinel Insurance Company. (Reza, Syed) |
|
Filing 6 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Sentinel Insurance Company. (Reza, Syed) |
Filing 5 NOTICE by Sentinel Insurance Company re #4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint and for Briefing Schedule (Waiver of Oral Argument) (Reza, Syed) |
Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint and for Briefing Schedule by Sentinel Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Reza, Syed) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Sentinel Insurance Company. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two Electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(jlan) |
Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Synaptek Corporation. (jlan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sentinel Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6212083) filed by Synaptek Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(jlan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Synaptek Corporation v. Sentinel Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Synaptek Corporation | |
Represented By: | Craig Crandall Reilly |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sentinel Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Syed Mohsin Reza |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.