Ladson v. D.C. Government Office of Risk Management, Conduent Parking and Mobility Solutions et al
AveMaria M. Ladson |
Robert Carter, D.C. Government Office of Risk Management, Conduent Parking and Mobility Solutions and Mark Derrick |
1:2018cv00994 |
August 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Alexandria Office |
Arlington |
Ivan D Davis |
T S Ellis |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER- It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If plaintiff wishes to appeal this decision, she must file a written Notice of Appeal with the Clerk of this court within thirty (30) days of receipt of this order. Failure to file a timely Notice of Appeal waives the right to appeal. Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 9/27/2018. (lcre, )(c/s to Plaintiff Pro-Se) |
Filing 5 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (lcre, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Pro Se E-Noticing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis on 8/14/2018. (lcre, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by AveMaria M. Ladson. (lcre, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Pro Se E-Noticing by AveMaria M. Ladson. (lcre, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Robert Carter, D.C. Government Office of Risk Management, Conduent Parking and Mobility Solutions, Mark Derrick, filed by AveMaria M. Ladson.(lcre, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.