Crowley et al v. Jupiter et al
Margaret Jonas, Francine Jupiter, Jay Jupiter and Margaret Crowley |
Offit Kurman, P.C. |
1:2018cv00996 |
August 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Alexandria Office |
Fairfax |
Michael S Nachmanoff |
Anthony J Trenga |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott A. Surovell on behalf of Margaret Crowley, Margaret Jonas, Francine Jupiter, Jay Jupiter (Surovell, Scott) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed Offit Kurman, P.C. waiver sent on 9/13/2018, answer due 11/13/2018. (aott) (Main Document 4 replaced on 9/18/2018) (aott, ). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Offit Kurman, P.C.. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(rban, ) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Margaret Crowley, Margaret Jonas, Francine Jupiter, Jay Jupiter. (Rozsa, Nathan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Offit Kurman, P.C. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6222998.), filed by Margaret Crowley, Margaret Jonas, Jay Jupiter, Francine Jupiter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(klau, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.