Winrow v. Pohanka of Chantilly, Inc.
| Tricia Winrow |
| Pohanka of Chantilly, Inc. |
| 1:2018cv01081 |
| August 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John F Anderson |
| Anthony J Trenga |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order - Upon consideration of the representations made by the parties in the Joint Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan, and taking note of the Scheduling Order entered in this case, the court makes the following rulings: The Joint Discovery Plan filed by the parties is approved and shall control discovery to the extent of its application unless further modified by the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 10/12/2018. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (wgar, )
|
| Filing 9 Joint Discovery Plan by Pohanka of Chantilly, Inc..(Radcliffe, Michelle) |
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER:Initial Pretrial Conference set for 10/17/2018 at 11:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 501 before Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/21/2019 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 701 before District Judge Anthony J Trenga. Discovery due by 2/15/2019.Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 9/24/2018. Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent, #2 Pretrial Notice)(dzir)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Pohanka of Chantilly, Inc..(Radcliffe, Michelle) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Pohanka of Chantilly, Inc.. (Radcliffe, Michelle) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle Bodley Radcliffe on behalf of Pohanka of Chantilly, Inc. (Radcliffe, Michelle) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Edward Lee Isler on behalf of Pohanka of Chantilly, Inc. (Isler, Edward) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT re #1 Complaint by Tricia Winrow. (Zellman, Jason) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Pohanka of Chantilly, Inc. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(dvanm, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pohanka of Chantilly, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6248882.), filed by Tricia Winrow. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Letter)(dvanm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Winrow v. Pohanka of Chantilly, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pohanka of Chantilly, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michelle Bodley Radcliffe |
| Represented By: | Edward Lee Isler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tricia Winrow | |
| Represented By: | Jason Frank Zellman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
