Dowd v. Lazo et al
| Mary Joanne Dowd, Carlos R. Lazo and Oscar A. Lazo |
| USBC-Alexandria (United States Bankruptcy Court) |
| 1:2018cv01515 |
| December 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John F Anderson |
| Leonie M Brinkema |
| Bankruptcy Withdrawl |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Carlos R. Lazo, Oscar A. Lazo. Signed by Clerk on 01/17/2019. (dvanm, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER - Having fully reviewed the Report, the Court adopts the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the Report as its own. Accordingly, plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment [Bankr. Dkt. No. 34] is GRANTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that default judgment in the amount of $58,236.00 be and is ENTERED in favor of plaintiff Mary J. Dowd, Trustee, against defendants Oscar A. Lazo and Carlos R. Lazo, jointly and severally with interest to accrue post-judgment at the federal judgment rate provided in 28 U.S.C. 1961. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 01/17/2019. (dvanm, )
|
| Filing 2 Copy of Docket Sheet, Order, and Report and Recommendation received from U.S. Bankruptcy Court by Mary Joanne Dowd, Carlos R. Lazo, Oscar A. Lazo. (acha, ) |
| Filing 1 Bankruptcy Transmittal Cover Sheet. (acha, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
