Park v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
| Susan Park |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv00096 |
| January 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Claude M Hilton |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 4/10/2019 at 11:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 301 before Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/15/2019 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 800 before District Judge Claude M. Hilton. Discovery due by 8/9/2019. Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 3/21/19. (Attachments: #1 Pretrial Notice, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form)(tarm)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint (Amended) by Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(Anthony, David) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Experian Information Solutions, Inc..(Anthony, David) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #4 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Defendant, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., shall be GRANTED an extension of time until on or before March 19, 2019 to file its responsive pleadings to the Complaint filed by Susan Park. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis on 3/6/19. (klau, )
|
| Filing 5 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Anthony, David) |
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (Proposed Agreed Order))(Anthony, David) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued for service by SPS as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(klau, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Claude M. Hilton and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (klau, ) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons by Susan Park. (Blankingship, Alexander) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with Jury Demand against Experian Information Solutions, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6461162.), filed by Susan Park. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Blankingship, Alexander) Modified text on 1/25/2019 to add defendant party (klau, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Park v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | David Neal Anthony |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Susan Park | |
| Represented By: | Alexander Hugo Blankingship, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
