Flick v. CSRA, Inc.
Robert Flick |
CSRA, Inc. |
1:2019cv00099 |
January 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
T S Ellis |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER:Initial Pretrial Conference set for 4/10/2019 at 11:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 500 before Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan. Discovery due by 7/19/2019.Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/15/2019 at 04:00 PM in Alexandria Courtroom 900 before District Judge T. S. Ellis III (if the parties do not file dispositive motions). Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/3/2019 at 04:00 PM in Alexandria Courtroom 900 before District Judge T. S. Ellis III (if the parties do file dispositive motions). Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 03/19/2019. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form, #2 Pretrial Notice)(tran) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by CSRA, Inc..(Speight, Summer) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed CSRA, Inc. served on 2/11/2019, answer due 3/4/2019 (dest, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer CSRA, Inc. answer due 3/18/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan on 2/28/2019. (See order for further details). (acha, ) |
Filing 6 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by CSRA, Inc.. (Speight, Summer) |
Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by CSRA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Speight, Summer) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Robert Flick re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits to Complaint)(Kline, Lucas) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Robert Flick re #1 Complaint Attachments to Complaint (Kline, Lucas) |
Notice of Correction re #3 NOTICE, An incomplete (missing case number, caption and signature block) document was filed. The filing user has been notified to refile the document. (klau, ) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to CSRA, Inc.. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Attorney)(acha, ) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge T. S. Ellis, III and Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan. (acha, ) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6462698.), filed by Robert Flick. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Coversheet, #2 Exhibit Summons)(Kline, Lucas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Flick v. CSRA, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CSRA, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Summer Laine Speight |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Robert Flick | |
Represented By: | Lucas Joel Kline |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.