Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. et al v. Khoury Bros., Ltd., dba Khoury Bros. Fine Jewelry
| Van Cleef & Arpels, a division of Richemont North America, Inc. and Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A. |
| Khoury Bros., Ltd., dba Khoury Bros. Fine Jewelry |
| 1:2019cv00239 |
| February 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Claude M Hilton |
| Michael S Nachmanoff |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Report on the filing of an action regarding trademark(s)-See Attached. (Attachments: #1 Attachment to AO-121)(acha, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A., Van Cleef & Arpels, a division of Richemont North America, Inc. re #1 Complaint USPTO Report (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Reilly, Craig) |
| Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A., Van Cleef & Arpels, a division of Richemont North America, Inc.. (Reilly, Craig) |
| Filing 1 Complaint , filed by Van Cleef & Arpels, S.A., Van Cleef & Arpels, a division of Richemont North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6514298.), (Reilly, Craig) Modified on 2/28/2019 Payment information added omitted in filing error (acha, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
