Gordon vs. Crawford, et al
Petitioner: Conroy E. Gordon
Case Number: 1:2019cv00348
Filed: March 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2019 Filing 3 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Jenny Kim and Certification of Local Counsel Adina Appelbaum Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6560016. by Conroy E. Gordon. (Appelbaum, Adina)
March 26, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Order to Show Cause by Conroy E. Gordon. (Appelbaum, Adina)
March 26, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0422-6559969.), filed by Conroy E. Gordon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Attachment, #3 Exhibit Ex 1, #4 Exhibit Ex 2, #5 Exhibit Ex 3, #6 Exhibit Ex 4, #7 Exhibit Ex 5, #8 Exhibit Ex 6, #9 Exhibit Ex 7, #10 Exhibit Ex 8, #11 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Release, #12 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting a Bond Hearing)(Appelbaum, Adina)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gordon vs. Crawford, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Conroy E. Gordon
Represented By: Adina Bassin Appelbaum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?