Al-Naqeb v. Neilsen et al
| Belal Al-Naqeb |
| David Paulk, Matthew Whitaker, Kristien Neilsen and Sean Gallagher |
| 1:2019cv00597 |
| May 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Leonie M Brinkema |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Mail sent to Belal Al-Naqeb Returned as Undeliverable. (pmil, ) |
| Filing 6 Response to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) filed by Sean Gallagher, Kristien Neilsen, Matthew Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Barghaan, Dennis) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr on behalf of Sean Gallagher, Kristien Neilsen, Matthew Whitaker (Barghaan, Dennis) |
Filing 4
ORDER that respondents show cause by Monday, 08/12/19 why Al-Naqeb's sect. 2241 petition should not be granted. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 06/11/19. (copy mailed to petitioner)(pmil, )
|
| Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 14683078746 (choy, ) Modified on 5/20/2019 (aott, )(Filing fee paid at time of filing). |
| Filing 2 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (choy, c/m 05/20/2019) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 14683078746.), filed by Belal Al-Naqeb. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Database, #2 Envelope)(choy, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
