Rosser v. Jenkins et al
Sean Kirby Rosser |
Officer Phillips, Officer Spruell, Officer Witt, Israel Hamilton and A. Jenkins |
1:2019cv00689 |
May 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
T S Ellis |
Michael S Nachmanoff |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Acknowledgment of Receipt letter sent to Sean K. Rosser. (acha, ) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Sean Kirby Rosser. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(acha, ) |
Filing 4 Declaration in Support re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sean Kirby Rosser. (acha, ) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Sean Kirby Rosser. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(acha, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sean Kirby Rosser. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(acha, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Israel Hamilton, A. Jenkins, Officer Phillips, Officer Spruell, Officer Witt (Filing fee $ 400.), filed by Sean Kirby Rosser. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Affidavit, #8 Summons, #9 Letter, #10 Prisoner Data Report, #11 Envelope)(acha, ) |
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Sean Kirby Rosser. (acha, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.