Raya v. National Patient Account Services, Inc.
Susana Raya |
National Patient Account Services, Inc. and NPAS, Inc. |
1:2019cv00750 |
June 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
Liam O'Grady |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Susana Raya. NPAS, Inc. waiver sent on 6/7/2019, answer due 8/6/2019. (Nadas, Rachel) |
Filing 4 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against NPAS, Inc., filed by Susana Raya.(klau, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, attached to Plaintiff's Motion (Dkt. 2-1 ), is deemed filed as of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan on 7/1/19. (klau, ) |
Filing 2 Consent MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint by Susana Raya. (Attachments: #1 First Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Proposed Order)(Nadas, Rachel) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Liam O'Grady and Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan. (klau, ) |
Filing 1 Complaint with Jury Demand against National Patient Account Services, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6680476.), filed by Susana Raya. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Nadas, Rachel) Modified text on 6/10/2019 (klau, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.