Lopez v. Jang-Won Restaurant, Inc.
Juan Garcia Lopez and Moris Paz |
Jang-Won Restaurant, Inc. |
1:2019cv00836 |
June 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Ivan D Davis |
Claude M Hilton |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Jang-Won Restaurant, Inc.. (Miller, Zachary) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Jang-Won Restaurant, Inc..(Miller, Zachary) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Jang-Won Restaurant, Inc., filed by Juan Garcia Lopez, Moris Paz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Redline First Amended Complaint)(Greenberg, Gregg) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Juan Garcia Lopez as to Jang-Won Restaurant, Inc. served on 6/25/2019, answer due 7/16/2019 (Greenberg, Gregg) Modified text on 6/28/2019 (klau, ). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Jang-Won Restaurant, Inc.. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Attorney)(acha, ) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6704578.), filed by Juan Garcia Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Summons)(Greenberg, Gregg) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Claude M. Hilton and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (acha, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.