Csoka v. Mackey et al
| Michael Hanley, Timothy Purnell, Esquire, Karen Weed, Daniel Francis Mackey and Great Again Solutions, LLC |
| USBC-Alexandria (United States Bankruptcy Court) |
| John Csoka, Jr. |
| 1:2019cv00884 |
| July 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Anthony J Trenga |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Brief in Support of Appeal filed by John Csoka, Jr. (Spurlock-Brown, John) |
| Filing 6 Bankruptcy Record Document #69 (lcre, ) |
| Filing 5 Bankruptcy Record Document #67. (lcre, ) |
| Filing 4 Sealed Document from Bankruptcy Court. (lcre, ) |
| Filing 3 Bankruptcy Scheduling Order: Appellant Brief due by 8/31/2019. Appellee's brief is due by 30 days from the date of service of appellants brief.Appellant may file a reply brief within 14 days from the date of service of appellees brief.(lcre, ) |
| Filing 2 Bankruptcy Transmittal Cover Sheet. (Attachments: #1 Bankruptcy Record, #2 Bankruptcy Record)(lcre, ) |
| Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number 18-11934-KHK. File received, filed by John Csoka, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Bankruptcy Transmittal Sheet, #2 Bankruptcy Orders)(acha, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
