Aguilar et al v. Hull et al
Oscar Contreras Aguilar, Reginald Dupree and Rolando Juarez Vasquez |
Phyllis Back and Ted Hull |
1:2019cv01005 |
August 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Ivan D Davis |
Anthony J Trenga |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Mail sent to Oscar Contreras Aguilar DE #6 Returned as Undeliverable. (acha, ) |
Filing 6 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (aott,c/m 8/2/2019 3 plt's ) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Oscar Contreras Aguilar. (aott, ) Modified on 8/2/2019 (aott, ). |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rolando Juarez Vasquez. (aott, ) Modified on 8/2/2019 (aott, ). |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Reginald Dupree. (aott, ) Modified on 8/2/2019 (aott, ). |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Oscar Contreras Aguilar. (aott, ) Modified on 8/2/2019 (aott, ). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Phyllis Back, Ted Hull, filed by Oscar Contreras Aguilar, Rolando Juarez Vasquez, Reginald Dupree. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Envelope 9, #10 Prisoner Database)(aott, ) Modified on 8/2/2019 (aott, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.