Rajan v. Pantheon, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Chandran P. Rajan
Defendant: Pantheon, Inc., Sunil Anand and Rajesh Purushothaman
Case Number: 1:2019cv01085
Filed: August 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Michael S Nachmanoff
Referring Judge: Anthony J Trenga
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 So Ordered re #19 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal WITHOUT PREJUDICE filed by Chandran P. Rajan. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 10/8/2019. (See order for further details). (acha, )
October 8, 2019 Filing 19 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice by Chandran P. Rajan (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Halperin, Jonathan)
October 3, 2019 Set Deadlines as to #16 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Personal Jurisdiction). Motion Hearing set for 11/1/2019 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 701 before District Judge Anthony J Trenga. (clar, )
October 2, 2019 Filing 18 Notice of Hearing Date November 1, 2019 at 10:00 A.M. re #17 Memorandum in Support, #16 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Personal Jurisdiction) (Hinger, Cathy)
October 2, 2019 Filing 17 Memorandum in Support re #16 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Personal Jurisdiction) filed by Sunil Anand. (Hinger, Cathy)
October 2, 2019 Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Personal Jurisdiction) by Sunil Anand. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hinger, Cathy)
October 2, 2019 Set Deadlines as to #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . Motion Hearing set for 11/1/2019 at 10:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 701 before District Judge Anthony J Trenga. (dvanm, )
October 1, 2019 Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Pantheon, Inc.. (Hinger, Cathy)
October 1, 2019 Filing 14 Notice of Hearing Date November 1, 2019 at 10:00 A.M. re #13 Memorandum in Support, #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Hinger, Cathy)
October 1, 2019 Filing 13 Memorandum in Support re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Pantheon, Inc., Rajesh Purushothaman. (Hinger, Cathy)
October 1, 2019 Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Pantheon, Inc., Rajesh Purushothaman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hinger, Cathy)
September 30, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Cathy Ann Hinger on behalf of Sunil Anand (Hinger, Cathy)
September 18, 2019 Filing 10 STIPULATION by Sunil Anand. (Hinger, Cathy)
September 11, 2019 Filing 9 Certificate of Compliance Sunil Anand served on 9/11/2019, answer due 10/2/2019. (acha, )
September 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff on 9/10/2019. (rban, )
September 9, 2019 Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Pantheon, Inc., Rajesh Purushothaman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hinger, Cathy)
September 9, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Cathy Ann Hinger on behalf of Pantheon, Inc., Rajesh Purushothaman (Hinger, Cathy)
August 16, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Sunil Anand, Pantheon, Inc., Rajesh Purushothaman. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachment for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(pmil, )
August 15, 2019 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Anthony J Trenga and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff. (pmil, )
August 15, 2019 Filing 4 Proposed Summons Sunil Anand by Chandran P. Rajan. (Halperin, Jonathan)
August 15, 2019 Filing 3 Proposed Summons Rajesh Purushothaman by Chandran P. Rajan. (Halperin, Jonathan)
August 15, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons Pantheon, Inc. by Chandran P. Rajan. (Halperin, Jonathan)
August 15, 2019 Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6791499.), filed by Chandran P. Rajan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Halperin, Jonathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rajan v. Pantheon, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pantheon, Inc.
Represented By: Cathy Ann Hinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sunil Anand
Represented By: Cathy Ann Hinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rajesh Purushothaman
Represented By: Cathy Ann Hinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chandran P. Rajan
Represented By: Jonathan Eric Halperin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?