Diginus BV v. 1001.com, an Internet Domain Name et al
Diginus BV |
1001.com, an Internet Domain Name and John Doe |
1:2019cv01089 |
August 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
John F Anderson |
Liam O'Grady |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Declaration re #6 Order on Motion for Service by Publication by Diginus BV. (Attachments: #1 Letter Regarding Service)(Barnes, Attison) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #3 MOTION for Service by Publication by Diginus BV Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 8/28/2019. (See order for further details). (acha, ) |
Filing 5 Waiver of re #3 MOTION for Service by Publication Waiver of Hearing by Diginus BV (Kosak, Adrienne) |
Filing 4 Memorandum in Support re #3 MOTION for Service by Publication filed by Diginus BV. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Declaration of A. Kosak))(Kosak, Adrienne) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Service by Publication by Diginus BV. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kosak, Adrienne) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Diginus BV. (Barnes, Attison) |
Filing 1 Complaint , filed by Diginus BV. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Barnes, Attison) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Liam O'Grady and Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (jlan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.